• |

Data Privacy

  • Litigation
  • Compliance
  • Connected Devices

Dec. 12, 2018

Illinois Appellate Decision Creates Split on Standing to Sue Under BIPA

Dec. 5, 2018

Answers to Four Critical Questions on Privilege in Internal Investigations

Sep. 19, 2018

Ohio Adopts Pioneering Cybersecurity Safe Harbor for Companies

Jun. 6, 2018

Analyzing New and Amended State Breach Notification Laws

May 9, 2018

The Right to Be Forgotten: English High Court Details When Google Must Delist Links to Crimes

May 2, 2018

Lessons on Litigation Privilege in Internal Investigations from the U.K.’s Bilta v. Royal Bank of Scotland Case

Feb. 14, 2018

Dynamic Regulations and Shareholder Actions Guide the Board’s Shifting Role in Cyber (Part Two of Two)

Feb. 14, 2018

NY AG and HHS Flex Regulatory Muscles in Recent Protected Health Information Breach Settlements

Jan. 31, 2018

Dynamic Regulations and Shareholder Actions Guide the Board’s Shifting Role in Cyber (Part One of Two)

Jan. 31, 2018

Biometric Data Protection Laws and Litigation Strategies (Part One of Two)

Dec. 6, 2017

Actions Under Biometric Privacy Laws Highlight Related Risks

Oct. 11, 2017

Reconciling Data Localization Laws and the Global Flow of Information

Sep. 27, 2017

New Criteria for Employee Monitoring Practices in Light of ECHR Decision

Sep. 13, 2017

Dispelling Myths About When Attorney-Client Privilege Applies to Communications With In-House Counsel

May 31, 2017

Reacting Quickly With a Nimble Incident Response Plan

Apr. 19, 2017

How to Walk the Tightrope of Cooperation and Privilege When Facing Government Investigations and Parallel Litigation

Mar. 8, 2017

Defense and Plaintiff Perspectives on How to Survive Data Privacy Collateral Litigation

Mar. 8, 2017

Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product While Cooperating With the Government: Implications for Collateral Litigation (Part Three of Three)

Feb. 22, 2017

Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product While Cooperating with the Government: Strategies to Minimize Risks During Cooperation (Part Two of Three)

Feb. 8, 2017

Third and Seventh Circuits Shed New Light on Spokeo Standing Analysis

Feb. 8, 2017

Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product While Cooperating With the Government: Establishing Privilege and Work Product in an Investigation (Part One of Three)

Nov. 30, 2016

Attorney-Consultant Privilege? Structuring and Implementing the Kovel Arrangement (Part Two of Two)

Nov. 16, 2016

Attorney-Consultant Privilege? Key Considerations for Invoking the Kovel Doctrine (Part One of Two)

Sep. 7, 2016

Lessons From Consumer Challenges to Email Review Practices

Aug. 3, 2016

Six State Secrets and Data Privacy Considerations in Chinese Internal Investigations 

Jun. 22, 2016

How to Avoid Common Mistakes and Manage the First 48 Hours Post-Breach

Jun. 8, 2016

Minimizing Class Action Risk in Breach Response

Jun. 8, 2016

Eight Attributes In-House Counsel Look For in Outside Cybersecurity Counsel

May 25, 2016

Spokeo’s Impact on Data Breach Cases: The Class Action Floodgates Have Not Been Opened, But the Door Has Not Been Locked

May 25, 2016

Foreign Attorneys Share Insight on Data Privacy and Privilege in Multinational Investigations

May 11, 2016

When Do Consumers Have Standing to Sue Over Data Breaches?

Apr. 27, 2016

Federal Judge Offers Advice on Litigating Data Privacy, Security Breach and TCPA Class Action Suits

Apr. 27, 2016

A Guide to Developing and Implementing a Successful Cyber Incident Response Plan: From Data Mapping to Evaluation (Part One of Three)

Mar. 30, 2016

Making Sense of Conflicting Standing Decisions in Data Breach Cases

Mar. 30, 2016

In-House and Outside Counsel Offer Strategies for Navigating the TCPA, Avoiding Litigation and Responding to Breaches

Feb. 3, 2016

Germany Eases Restrictions on Certain Privacy Class Actions

Dec. 9, 2015

Proactive Steps to Protect Your Company in Anticipation of Future Data Security Litigation (Part Two of Two)

Nov. 25, 2015

Proactive Steps to Protect Your Company in Anticipation of Future Data Security Litigation (Part One of Two)

Nov. 11, 2015

California Law Enforcement Faces Higher Bar in Acquiring Electronic Information

Nov. 11, 2015

Target Privilege Decision Delivers Guidance for Post-Data Breach Internal Investigations

Sep. 16, 2015

Privacy and Cybersecurity in Canada: Legal Risk Update

Sep. 16, 2015

Examining Evolving Legal Ethics in the Age of the Cloud, Mobile Devices and Social Media (Part Two of Two)  

Jul. 29, 2015

Analyzing and Complying with Cyber Law from Different Vantage Points (Part Two of Two)

Jul. 29, 2015

Seventh Circuit Reopens a Door for Plaintiffs in Data Breach Class Actions

Jul. 15, 2015

Analyzing and Complying with Cyber Law from Different Vantage Points (Part One of Two)

Jul. 1, 2015

What Companies Need to Know About the FCC’s Actions Against Unwanted Calls and Texts

Jul. 1, 2015

Preserving Privilege Before and After a Cybersecurity Incident (Part Two of Two)

Jun. 17, 2015

Preserving Privilege Before and After a Cybersecurity Incident (Part One of Two)

May 6, 2015

Lessons from the 2013 Target Data Breach: What Future Resolutions of Large-Scale Data Breaches May Look Like

Most-Read Articles

Webinar: Building a Strong Relationship Between Privacy and Information Security Teams for Effective Data Protection

Join the Cybersecurity Law Report on January 24, 2019, from 12:00pm-1:00pm EST, for a complimentary webinar about how privacy and security professionals can effectively coordinate for strong data protection programs. Dan Koslofsky, associate general counsel at Gap Inc., and Aaron Weller, co-founder and strategy VP for Sentinel LLC, will join the Cybersecurity Law Report’s Jill Abitbol to discuss, among other topics, the evolving roles of privacy and security professionals and practical examples of best practices for successful communication and coordination of efforts. Registration information is here.