A federal jury in August decided that Meta illegally eavesdropped on millions of women who entered menstrual and pregnancy health data into the Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker app. Meta’s violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) could trigger statutory damages running into the hundreds of millions of dollars. This article, the second in a two-part series about CIPA lawsuits, discusses the implications of Meta’s trial loss for other companies, with lessons about consent, software development kit use, AI training notice, anonymization and class action waivers. It also distills the cloudy CIPA litigation landscape, which has seen several notable but clashing pretrial decisions in 2025, with commentary from privacy litigators at Farella, Braun & Martel, Holland & Knight, and Troutman Amin. Part one in the series discussed five disputed points in the Meta trial and key variables that shaped the verdict. See “Healthline’s Record-Setting CCPA Settlement Offers Lessons on Transparency and Opt-Outs” (Aug. 6, 2025).